<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Good for Google&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/</link>
	<description>A Guide to Gifts, Gadgets, Gizmos and Product Reviews for Everyday Domestic Bliss</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double Headboard</title>
		<link>http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/comment-page-1/#comment-19179</link>
		<dc:creator>Double Headboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/#comment-19179</guid>
		<description>i would always sign up on affiliate programs on the internet to earn extra money for my home -*:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would always sign up on affiliate programs on the internet to earn extra money for my home -*:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/comment-page-1/#comment-14091</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/#comment-14091</guid>
		<description>there are many affiliate programs you can join but some of them are scams.*&#039;;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are many affiliate programs you can join but some of them are scams.*&#8217;;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihsan</title>
		<link>http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13477</link>
		<dc:creator>ihsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/#comment-13477</guid>
		<description>thank you teacher...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you teacher&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domestic Divapalooza</title>
		<link>http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Domestic Divapalooza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>I think the rates the advertisers are being dished is going to spike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the rates the advertisers are being dished is going to spike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyprus Apartments</title>
		<link>http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyprus Apartments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>Well, another new thing on Google. What can we expect from this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, another new thing on Google. What can we expect from this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgadget.com/whats-good-for-google/#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>Gayla, think about it! If you&#039;re getting less money because of this, &lt;em&gt;then so are Google&lt;/em&gt;.
The idea is that with a smaller area to click, the links in an ad where I&#039;m sure most clicks are targeted anyway as users are used to clicking things that look like links, there is less chance of accidental clicks. This means two things, advertisers see a more targeted traffic and there are less examples of bad clicks or even click fraud.
This will give advertisers more confidence in Adsense and cause them to put more money towards it, possibly paying more for clicks as they are worth more. This means that you may get less clicks in the end on your adverts, but you will get more for each of them, balancing out the change.
If anything, the old way was Google testing things out and when it turned out that advertisers liked links to be harder to click so that only those who meant to click there get through, they have now reacted.
I&#039;ll finish with my first point, if you are making less money, so are Google. They wouldn&#039;t do anything that would harm their top money spinner too much, it would be suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gayla, think about it! If you&#8217;re getting less money because of this, <em>then so are Google</em>.</p>
<p>The idea is that with a smaller area to click, the links in an ad where I&#8217;m sure most clicks are targeted anyway as users are used to clicking things that look like links, there is less chance of accidental clicks. This means two things, advertisers see a more targeted traffic and there are less examples of bad clicks or even click fraud.</p>
<p>This will give advertisers more confidence in Adsense and cause them to put more money towards it, possibly paying more for clicks as they are worth more. This means that you may get less clicks in the end on your adverts, but you will get more for each of them, balancing out the change.</p>
<p>If anything, the old way was Google testing things out and when it turned out that advertisers liked links to be harder to click so that only those who meant to click there get through, they have now reacted.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll finish with my first point, if you are making less money, so are Google. They wouldn&#8217;t do anything that would harm their top money spinner too much, it would be suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

